show video detail
Ted Cruz Grills Sally Yates For Refusing To Defend Travel Ban Executive Order 5/8/17
- Published_at:2017-05-08
- Category:News & Politics
- Channel:LIVE ON-AIR NEWS
- tags: TED CRUZ SALLY YATES TED CRUZ JAMES CLAPPER TED CRUZ GRILLS SALLY YATES TED CRUZ SALLY YATES TRAVEL BAN TED CRUZ SALLY YATES EXECUTIVE ORDER SALLY YATES TED CRUZ TRAVEL BAN EXECUTIVE ORDER sally yates senate hearing sally yates testifies sally yates russia hearing sally yates testimony sally yates senate sally yates senate live stream
- description: Ted Cruz Grills Sally Yates on Refusing To Defend Travel ban Executive Order 5/8/17. Ted Cruz and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates squared off in a testy showdown over President Donald Trump‘s proposed travel ban — which, in its original form, proposed a ban on travel to the U.S. from seven Muslim-majority countries. Yates was fired by Trump after refusing to implement the ban, which was eventually ruled to be unconstitutional by a Federal Circuit Court. The Texas senator, in his allotted time for questioning at Monday’s Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing about interference in the 2016 election, pressed Yates on the ban. He asked if she was familiar with 8 U.S.C. 1182. Yates said she wasn’t.“Well, it is the binding statutory authority for the executive order that you refused to implement and that led to your termination,” Cruz said. “So it certainly is a relevant and not a terribly obscure statute.” Cruz then proceeded to quote from the statute: Whenever the President finds that the entry of any alien or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem appropriate. “Would you agree that that is broad statutory authorization?” Cruz asked. Yates wasted no time with her response: “I would, and I am familiar with that, and I’m also familiar with an additional provision of the INA that says ‘no person shall receive preference or be discriminated against in issuance of a visa because of race, nationality or place of birth.’ That, I believe, was promulgated after the statute that you just quoted. And that’s been part of the discussion with the courts with respect to the INA is whether this more specific statute trumps the first one that you just described. But my concern was not an INA concern here. It rather was a Constitutional concern, whether or not the executive order here violated the Constitution specifically with the establishment clause and equal protection and due process.”
| ranked in date | views | likes | Comments | ranked in country (#position) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-10 | 297,326 | 1,824 | 2,106 |
( ,#9)
( ,#9)
|
